There are two measurements involved in the assessment of a manager's soft skills, just as there are when measuring quality.
First, there is measurement of the manager's compliance with using soft skills. This requires precisely defining those skills just as one would define quality standards.
Second, there is measuring the effect of the result of the use of soft skills or the use of quality standards. This would mean measuring productivity resulting from the use of soft skills, just as one would seek increased sales and consumer satisfaction as a result of quality controls.
I think that we know how to make the second measurements, but we don't have defined metrics for soft skills. As a starting point, I would recommend a simple test consisting of the 10 questions below. Rank a manager on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the best or almost always performs the action and 1 being the worst or almost never performs the action. Add up the points for each question. If the score is close to 100, I would expect that employees will be over 3 times more productive than if the score was 30 or less. In addition, with a score close to 100, employees will unleash their full creativity and innovation, love to come to work and have very high morale.
Remember that leadership is science and thus the results of your leadership are fully measurable and every manager, executive, boss should go about setting and reaching leadership metrics. The impact on your organization in terms of ROI has been proven to be considerable. With attention paid to the areas listed above, you can increase productivity, retention, innovation, creativity, morale, and revenue.
Next related article: How Managers Create Low Morale In Their Employees